CHN Champions Network:  Football   Baseball   College Basketball  |  NBA Draft  NBA Basketball  Soccer  Message Board

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 

THE PREVIEW!

We rank the top 40.. and then CHN preview expert Joel Welser breaks down each team in the web's best free in-depth capsules.

Why go anywhere else?

 

CHNFootball.com Homepage 2007 CHN Football Preview

 

2007 MAC Football Preview

by Raphielle Johnson

 

There once was a time when a MAC team knocking off an opponent from the Big Ten seemed to happen every September. Well, while leagues such as the WAC and Mountain West have improved to the point that it isn’t a shock to see their members take out BCS conference foes, the MAC has taken a step back. Well, 2007 could be the beginning of the Mid-American’s rise back up the non-BCS conference ladder. Offensive weapons return at schools such as Ohio (running back Kalvin McRae) and Central Michigan (quarterback Dan LeFevour). Luckily for the MAC, the conference’s only coaching change (Butch Jones at Central Michigan) took place because the previous head coach moved on to a job at a BCS school (Brian Kelly to Cincinnati). So while the Mid-American may not have a team capable of making a run to a BCS bowl, the gap is closing. Here’s a quick preview of the Mid-American Conference.

 

Overall Champion: Central Michigan

Players of the Year: QB Dan LeFevour (Central Michigan) and LB Daniel Holtzclaw (Eastern Michigan)

Best Kicker and Punter: K Chris Nendick (Northern Illinois) and P Chris Miller (Ball State)

Special Teams Player of the Year: Brandon West (Western Michigan)

Best Running Backs: Jalen Parmele (Toledo) and Kalvin McRae (Ohio)

Best NFL Prospect: McRae

Coach of the Year: Butch Jones (Central Michigan)

 

How they’ll finish

MAC East

  1. Ohio (2006: 9-5, 7-1; returning starters- 11: 5 offensive, 6 defensive)

Frank Solich is back for another season in Athens despite fears that some BCS school would inquire about his services in the very near future. While that still could happen at some point, the Bobcats have a good shot at repeating as East Division champions due to the return of senior running back Kalvin McRae. McRae was the MAC’s second best back (behind Garrett Wolfe of NIU) in 2006, putting up more than 1,500 all-purpose yards. His return will be of great assistance to quarterbacks Brad Bower and Theo Scott. Bower, entering his senior season, will start the opener but this position lacks extensive game experience. The key to helping McRae better his 2006 numbers will be improving a passing offense that ranked 115th in the country last season. 

  1. Kent State (2006: 6-6, 5-3; returning starters- 15: 8 offensive, 7 defensive)

The Golden Flashes are already off to a good start this season, winning their opener at Iowa State 23-14. In 2006, Kent had its second non-losing record since 1987, and who’s to say they can’t make it three in 2007. The defense, which was the league’s second best in 2006, will welcome back seven starters, including middle linebacker Stevon Moss. On offense look for junior quarterback Julian Edelman to be even tougher to contain, but taking that step towards a MAC championship will hinge on a kicking game that was flat-out bad in 2006. Kent kickers were 2-for-10 in the field goal department last season, a percentage that won’t get it done. Special teams as a whole were poor in 2006, and yet they still managed to finish 6-6. Imagine if they can improve that area.

  1. Bowling Green (2006: 4-8, 3-5; returning starters- 14: 6 offensive, 8 defensive)

The passing attack took a serious hit before 2006 even began when quarterback Omar Jacobs decided to enter the NFL Draft. Lack of experience led to the Falcons having part of their offensive attack grounded to the tune of 169 yards per game through the air. Now, after a season in which many players were thrown to the wolves as youngsters (13 true freshmen saw extensive action), expect BGSU to make some improvements. At quarterback, Tyler Sheehan and Anthony Turner will most likely split reps, but at least both have their experiences from 2006 to fall back on. Also, there are some experienced backs that helped Bowling Green finish 18th nationally in rushing offense. And while the defense was one of the better units in the MAC, special teams left something to be desired. With the added experience, the Falcons could play a role in the title hunt. Come 2008, expect them to be the favorite.

  1. Akron (2006: 5-7, 3-5; returning starters- 13: 5 offensive, 8 defensive)

The Zips will have to replace Luke Getsy at quarterback this season, and there are three candidates for the job. Carlton Jackson, Chris Jacquemain and Sean Hakes all have a chance to replace Getsy, with Jackson (scrambler) and Jacquemain (prefers to stay in the pocket) offering contrasting styles that could confuse opponents. At least there’s experience at running back with the return of Dennis Kennedy and Andre Walker. But even with these two coming back, the Zips need to improve a run game that was 111th in the nation last season. The defense will have to carry this team early on, and the special teams (especially punting) will need to improve if Akron wants to have a shot at bowl eligibility.

  1. Miami-Ohio (2006: 2-10, 2-6; returning starters- 15: 8 offensive, 7 defensive)

The Redhawks, coming off of an Independence Bowl appearance in 2005, had a tough go of it in the first year under Shane Montgomery. The three seasons prior saw Miami win some sort of conference title (division or outright) each year, so the freefall to 2-10 was a shock to many around the program. The offensive line, which gave up 49 sacks in 12 games, should be improved with three starters returning. But that’s only as long as the unit can stay healthy. Mike Kokal, second in the MAC in total offense in 2006, is back at quarterback for Coach Montgomery. The defense returns seven starters to a unit that was ninth in the country against pass…and 101st against the run. While the front seven returns some experience that should help against the run, due to the many questions in the backfield don’t expect the Redhawks to be in the top ten against the pass. With another year under their belts, Miami should be improved. But then again, the teams ahead of them have made strides as well. 

  1. Temple (2006: 1-11; returning starters- 16: 9 offensive, 7 defensive)

After two seasons as an Independent, taking their lumps from just about any school that needed a game, the Owls once again have a conference to call home. Unlike their days in the Big East, where you pretty much knew that they had not shot at competing with the likes of Miami and Virginia Tech (and you wondered whether or not their administration even cared), Al Golden has infused a positive attitude that has players believing. Even in woodshed events (such as back-to-back 62-0 losses to Louisville and Minnesota), the Owls didn’t quit. This change should benefit them in their new conference, but don’t expect to see a quick trek to the top of the MAC East. However, 22 freshmen saw playing time against what ended up being the nation’s third toughest schedule, so don’t expect the “deer in headlights” reaction from Temple. Temple ranked near the bottom of the Bowl Subdivision in all three phases of the game last year, so some moderate improvement could be all that you can ask for right now.

  1. Buffalo (2006: 2-10, 1-7; returning starters- 17: 8 offensive, 9 defensive)

Just when the Bulls could say that they were the sixth best team in their division (out of six), here comes Temple. Well, Buffalo will drop down another rung as a result. Although their season opener was against 16th ranked Rutgers, allowing Scarlet Knights to run roughshod all over the field wasn’t a good sign of things to come. Then again, maybe Turner Gill’s team could end up finishing ahead of Temple this season: they beat the Owls in the season opener in 2006. The final score? 9-3…in overtime. In order for the Bulls to improve on their win total from a year ago, quarterback Drew Willy may have to carry this team on his back.

 

MAC West

  1. Central Michigan (2006: 10-4, 7-1; returning starters- 14: 7 offensive, 7 defensive)

It’s not often that a team who loses their head coach is expected to win their division once again. The defending MAC champions will now be led by Butch Jones, but don’t expect a dropoff with Dan LeFevour back at quarterback. In 2006, LeFevour threw for more than 3,000 yards and 26 touchdown passes. While the skill positions return some talented players, the Chippewas will have to replace linemen Joe Staley and Drew Mormino, both of whom are now being paid to play in the NFL. Defensive end Dan Bazuin is the third Chippewa off to the NFL, so look for a deep secondary to lead the way. In order for CMU to defend their title, they’ll also need to get more from their return game.

  1. Ball State (2006: 5-7, 5-3: returning starters- 13: 7 offensive, 6 defensive)

In four seasons coaching his alma mater, Brady Hoke has a record of 15-31. This could be the season that Hoke gives the Cardinal faithful a MAC West title to cheer about. In order for this to come to fruition, Ball State will need even more growth from sophomore quarterback Nate Davis. Davis was 18th in the country last season in passing efficiency, and the freshman experiences should make him even better this year. The keys to this season will be improving the running game to take pressure off of Davis, and the defense stepping up after a terrible 2006 (115th overall). Given their defense, it’s a surprise the Cardinals won as many games as they did last season. Improvement on that side of the ball could mean a bowl game in 2007.

  1. Western Michigan (2006: 8-5, 6-2; returning starters- 16: 8 offensive, 8 defensive)

The Broncos mad their first bowl appearance since 1988 in last season’s International Bowl, and an experienced core will look to taste even more postseason action in 2007. Either Thomas Peregrin or Tim Hiller will take over for the departed Ryan Cubit, but head coach Bill Cubit must be happy that running back Mark Bonds is back on campus after rushing for 1,082 yards in 2006. Having a solid group of receivers, such as Jamarko Simmons and Herb Martin, will help out the new quarterback as well. On defense, experience returns at all three levels, but the Broncos will have a tough time replacing linebacker Ameer Ismail. The nation’s 11th ranked defense in 2006 may have to do some heavy lifting early on until the quarterback position is settled. Unfortunately, they open the season in Morgantown against West Virginia.

  1. Toledo (2006: 5-7, 3-5; returning starters- 16: 8 offensive, 8 defensive)

Unfortunately for head coach Tom Amstutz, the Toledo football program has made news this off-season for reasons not related to this year’s team. Gambling allegations from seasons past have come to light, but there shouldn’t be too much of an effect on this year’s team. More importantly for the Rockets is rebounding from their first losing season since 1993. Running back Jalen Parmele will help out a great deal, especially with the unresolved quarterback position. Aaron Opelt and Clint Cochran competed for the job throughout fall camp, with Opelt getting the nod in the season opener against Purdue. At least the Boilermakers had one of the nation’s worst defenses last season. The defense should improve thanks to the return of eight starters, most notably safety Barry Church. If Coach Amstutz can keep the off-field issues away from his players, the Rockets can have some say in who wins the West. But the chances of them winning it are slim.

  1. Northern Illinois (2006: 7-6, 5-3; returning starters- 13: 6 offensive, 7 defensive)

Well, how does a program such as NIU replace their all-time leading running back (Garrett Wolfe), and one of the best offensive linemen to come through the MAC the last five years (Doug Free)? That’s the question that head coach Joe Novak will need to find an answer for if the Huskies are to go back to a bowl game. Dan Nicholson will have to step up at quarterback, and look for Montell Clanton and Justin Anderson to split carries in the backfield. Up front, having three starters back certainly helps, but there’s no Doug Free walking through that door either. The defense, led by end Larry English (12 sacks in 2006), could end up being the strength of this team. And given the many questions on offense, this could be a good thing.

  1. Eastern Michigan (2006: 1-11, 1-7; returning starters- 15: 7 offensive, 8 defensive)

Another year goes by, and it’s another season for the Eagles at the bottom of the MAC standings. The good news for head coach Jeff Genyk is that athletic director Dr. Derrick Gragg gave him a two-year pledge of support. This could either mean exactly what it is, or as it turns out in some cases with support from the AD the kiss of death. The key to the Eagles’ improvement on offense will be the three returning starters on the line keeping their quarterbacks (and running backs) upright and healthy. Tyler Jones may be the most versatile of the options at quarterback (he also played some tailback in 2006), but look for Andy Schmitt to see some time as well. On defense, Butkus Award candidate Daniel Holtzclaw may have to exceed his 114 tackles from a season ago if EMU is to improve its national ranking from 2006 (98th). With only 11 seniors on the roster, this will be a season in which the Eagles take their lumps early and often. But it could all begin to pay off in 2008.

 

 

 

Check out the rest of CHN's Top 40 & Conference Previews & more!..

Social Bookmark Stuff! Delicious | Digg | Reddit | Magnoliacom | Newsvine | Furl | Google | Yahoo | Technorati | Icerocket

From Shawn Siegel, creator of collegehoops.net, and the CHN Network of sites.

NCAA Football Shop

 

 

 

 

 

CHNFootball.com: Homepage | Media Kit | Write for CHN | Privacy Policy